- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I found this article surfing this morning at http://stopthecap.com/2009/11/02/hong-kong-broadband-network-cuts-price-in-half-100mbps-service-for-...
100mbps for 13 bucks a month. I didn't see no 5GB per month limit either.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
It's not just telecomms, it's all ISPs in general. Blame the Government. FCC regulations for this FTC regulations for that. All the red tape they put up we won't get 100Mbps anything for another 10 years.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Please show me the specific FTC and FCC regulations preventing US telecoms from allowing 100 Mb/S speeds over wireless networks. Op-ed pieces on net neutrality don't count.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Darnstrat wrote:Please show me the specific FTC and FCC regulations preventing US telecoms from allowing 100 Mb/S speeds over wireless networks. Op-ed pieces on net neutrality don't count.
Go find these examples yourself. That's why the Internet created Google. And Op-ed pieces on net neutrality WOULD count.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Actually, I'm quite familiar with the FCC regulations.... hence why I asked the question of those who blame everything on the government and regulations. Rather than back up their arguments and claims with facts, it so much easier to simply say the government is limiting free enterprise.
A little research on the part of the complainers would clearly show the telecoms are (inherently) self-serving corporations who do little in the public interest.
And Op-Ed pieces don't count because they simply reference rumors, allegations, pending legislation and don't present the entire picture. Further, by their very nature, they are OPINION, not fact.