- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Why if they are both bonded moca 2.0?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
This is because ECB6200 and WCB6200 uses Broadcom BCM6802 chip. Broadcom pulled out of MoCA business years ago and ceased to address compatibility issues.
Though no confirmation, I believe ECB5240M uses either MaxLinear or another silicon vendor's name I could not recall. The bottom line is, only bonded MoCA 2.0 (first condition) products using Broadcom chip (second condition) have compatibility issues. Nonetheless, G1100's unbonded MoCA 2.0 is compatible with MoCA 2.5 despite using Broadcom chip BCM6803 (only satisfies the second condition).
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
All right. Well I have a 1 GB contract for 2 years so my thinking is that the wcb6200 combined with the G 1100 will serve me good enough to get 450 megabytes per second and then if I combine it with a compatible mmocaocha bonded adapter I could get close to one gig.
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »