- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thank you for the advice. I will use it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
What does random breakage look like?
And what would it look like if something hit it? If something hit it wouldn't there be some kind of external evidence, such as a scratch on the glass?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
not if it was in your pocket, or a pouch... My son has done it before(actually more than once). One of the reasons why I get insurance for him.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
If you will look closely at the origin of the fracture you will notice that it begins as a very small straight line. I would love to see the internals of this phone and what is below that line.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I recall the fuss over the GS3 glass breaks well. Every single one of these supposed , "glass break, no drop" claims admitted the phone had been in a pocket. ( and they always put cell phones in their pockets before without a problem.)
All the pictures posted looked like stress fractures from bending the phone or a single impact fracture, from being hit in one spot pretty hard.
I'm not saying there were no defective GS3 or that this phone isn't defective. I am saying you don't have any proof, which is what you must have to support a class action suit.
I also think the insurance for phones needs overhauling. Most policies have a deductible equal to the cost of glass replacement. Which I imagine about 99% of claims are for glass. What a scam! $8 a month, $96 a year and a pretty much guarantee never to have to pay out for a repair.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
And that's what Samsung counts on. Lack of definitive proof. I'm pretty sure this was an actuary decision. It's cheaper to deny and accuse the consumer than to fix the phones. We're all just dumb, oafish brutes, after all, that smash our phones every chance we get.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Oh, you better believe it! They pay those guys big bucks to know what claims will cost them money, so that can generously cover everything else.
However, in the case of the GS3 glass breaks, everyone who admitted to putting their phone in a pocket, was guilty of mis-handling their phone, but just couldn't admit it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
That's why I said the batches matter. If multiple of these cracked glass happens within a batch it puts reasonable plausibility that the screens are faulty.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
In most cases judges have been known that 5% constitutes enough to have a "recall"(replacements) of those within that batch range.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Any idea where to find the batch number for a Galaxy Note 3 per chance?