Don't Expect Froyo Anytime Soon

[Droidbotics]

Why? Because Samsung and Verizon still cannot come to an agreement on rather the froyo is a feature update or maintenance update. Moreover, anytime their is a feature upgrade, Samsung charges the carrier a fee. While other carriers such as T- Mobile have given in and simply paid the feature fee, Verizon is reluctant to do so. This may come as a surprise to some, but the official Froyo update was ready for release back in October. But due to legal and copyright issues cannot be release on the Verizon network until Samsung and Verizon come to an agreement.

[RDXMenace]

Are you serious? Do you have any proof?

[MKF]

---

Droidbotics wrote:

Why? Because Samsung and Verizon still cannot come to an agreement on rather the froyo is a feature update or maintenance update. Moreover, anytime their is a feature upgrade, Samsung charges the carrier a fee. While other carriers such as T- Mobile have given in and simply paid the feature fee, Verizon is reluctant to do so. This may come as a surprise to some, but the official Froyo update was ready for release back in October. But due to legal and copyright issues cannot be release on the Verizon network until Samsung and Verizon come to an agreement.

---

This issue has been whipped like a dead horse ( or in this case android).

[SFObrien]

And here we go again, NO PROOF NO TRUTH!

TOS: 

• "Bombing" the Verizon Community or individual threads with repetitive or meaningless postings, postings unrelated to the purpose of the Verizon Community, excessive cross-posting;

[PJNC284]

someone only read the initial rumor and not the followup http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/18/samsung-says-it-isnt-charging-carriers-for-android-updates-pro/

[M91-30]

haha, op<reading.