Why is Verizon charging for hotspot after FCC ruling?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Do I misunderstand the FCC ruling that forbids Verizon from charging for hotspot functionality?
http://www.zdnet.com/let-my-wi-fi-go-fcc-rules-verizon-cant-charge-for-wi-fi-tethering-7000001916/
I got my new Moto X phone today (love it) and tried to turn on Hotspot. No go with additional fee. Huh?
Solved! Go to Correct Answer
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
If you are on the Share Everything plan, there is not additional cost for the hotspot.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
If you are on the Share Everything plan, there is not additional cost for the hotspot.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I'm not sure either but thanks a tons for the info. Verizon seems to do a lot of things that are against the law. I'll make sure I pass the word. You may want to file a complaint with BBB. I did on another matter.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Apparently the FCC ruling only pertains to third-party tethering apps that Verizon was blocking from the play store. It does not mandate Verizon to allow older plans to offer it free of charge.
It's my opinion that carriers should not charge for it on capped plans. Carriers in other countries don't.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
No, I don't think it's limited to 3'rd party apps. If you're buying their 4G LTE, they have to allow hotspot tethering. From the horse's mouth:
http://www.fcc.gov/document/verizon-wireless-pay-125-million-settle-investigation
The ending para sums it rather clearly to me:
"In addition, the company recently revised its service offerings such that consumers on usage-based
pricing plans may tether, using any application, without paying an additional fee."
That's me - a "usage-based" pricing plan.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The customers that still have unlimited data must pay to use mobile hotspot. If you have a limited data plan, tethering is included. That is the distinction.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
That's just it - I do not have an unlimited plan. 2GB per month, on 4G - and they're trying to charge me $20 per month for hotspot. That seems to be a direct violation of their agreement with the FCC.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
To clarify: I do not have an unlimited plan that was grandfathered in. I have the 2GB/month plan. I got that plan two years ago when I first joined Verizon. Yes, Verizon has a "Share Everything" plan that includes hotspot, however, the FCC ruling does not limit hotspot usage to certain plans. If you do not have an unlimited plan, and are using 4G, Verizon cannot charge you that $20/month.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
It would appear that this IS NOT the case as people have been reporting this discrepancy to the FCC for over a year now. One would think that IF Verizon was not adhering to the ruling, the FCC would have taken action.
Possibly old, retired plans would fall into those "narrow exceptions"?
"Specifically, licensees offering service on C Block spectrum “shall not deny, limit, or restrict the ability of their customers to use the devices and applications of their choice on the licensee’s C Block network,” subject to narrow exceptions."
Your link does not list what those exceptions are.
I think that the bottom line is that the excerpt you have listed above, "In addition, the company recently revised its service offerings such that consumers on usage-based pricing plans may tether, using any application, without paying an additional fee", mentions Verizon's service offerings on usage-based pricing plans. Unfortunately, you are on a retired plan which is NO LONGER one of Verizon's service offerings, possibly excluding it from the ruling.
It would be my guess that is how Verizon is justifying their policy to the FCC.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Agreed, without being able to read the source document, we're all speculating.
I did get a call from someone at Verizon yesterday (Chauncey), and to his credit, they were very helpful and spent almost 30 minutes talking to me. I can't say I agree with their position, but reasonable people can disagree without consternation.
There were perceived complications with the current Share plan, but Chauncey addressed my concerns (primarily expense report handling) and I'm satisfied. I'll be switching over to the Share plan on 12/8 and that will solve the hotspot issue.
Cheers & beers.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I agree with your reservations about the Share Everything plan. When it was first released, I was very reluctant to switch over as my bill with 2 smartphones and 2 basic phones would increase slightly.
At the time, I was considering changing my plan to 4 smartphones which I have since done. If I were to stay on my old plan, my monthly bill would have increased by $60 by adding the 2 smartphones at $30 each for 2 data plans. If I were to switch to the Share Everything plan with the 4 smartphones, my bill would only have increased by $20 instead of the $60 it would have increased on the Share Everything plan, so I made the switch. As an added benefit, I also have use of the mobile hotspot when needed. I have been quite happy with the Share Everything plan.
Good luck and hope you are happy with the new plan.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I'm in the four line boat too, and it's also part of the complication.
One line is for my mother-in-law, but she no longer needs it as she is now in a nursing home. I had to keep it on my plan until 11/26 or pay the early term fee. With that phone still on my account, it messed up the price compare tool on the website, so I never could get a good idea of what I'd be paying. Chauncey worked it out and I should save a few bucks. He also setup something that will auto remove the MIL phone on 12/7 (the end of my billing cycle), which is why he suggested I wait until 12/8 to switch plans.
I'd been attracted to the Share plan in the recent past, but I was unsure how that would impact my expense reporting at EOM (I get reimbursed for cell phone expense). On the plus side, I use a medium amount of inet (via 4G), the wife almost none, but the kid in college gets every mile out of her 2GB each month. I'm not going to tell her we're on a shared plan, which should mean I won't have to worry about her going over 2GB.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I'd be curious to see if your daughter's college has wifi available. My daughter has wifi available almost throughout her entire college campus(in all buildings and in most outdoor areas) and in her dorm. As a result, she hardly uses any data on her line.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes, she has wifi (University of Florida), and uses it. I think a lot of her bandwidth usage is from Pandora when she's not on campus, but, I won't pretend to understand what a 21 yr/old does these days.
