Child Item

Site Totals

61243 Questions Answered 267 Categories

Total Equipment Protections - What a Rip!

I've been a loyal Verizon customer since 2010, and to this point, had little problem with this company. However, I recently upgraded to a Droid Maxx after my Galaxy Nexus died last September. I've had the phone for three weeks today, and purchased it for its positive reviews on durability. I was on my way to the car this morning and slipped on a patch of ice. My phone hit the pavement, and now the screen is cracked. I purchased the "Total Equipment Protection" on the phone to protect against this kind of thing. No problem (I thought) - I would call Verizon, and the phone would be replaced for a nominal fee (I'm thinking $50 at the most). They put me through to Asurion to file a claim, only to find that it would cost me $150 to replace a phone I've had for 3 weeks! Wow!

So I called Verizon back to hash it out with them, and they refuse to do anything - not even replace it with a refurbished phone at a lesser cost. This is what I get for my $11/month "total protection". So now I'm stuck with a cracked screen for two years (I don't have $150 lying around to throw at this). The only other option I have is to see if another carrier will buy out my contract and give me a comparable phone. Very disappointing!

Buyer beware - the "Total Protection Program" is not worth it!

Comments

GalaxyClass

Total Protection is a good plan, good for Verizon that is and not so go for some if not all customers. Do the math and save $$$.
Most of the out of pocket money on an average smartphone is in the area of 99.00 to $300.00. You can save more yourself by setting aside that money for the purchase of another phone and even more by having a spare phone on hand, I do both. Asurion is only required to provide a " similar type or recondition phone so don't always count on that same model phone. Verizon will only provide a CPO headache. After warranty protection for almost any device is not a good way to spend your $$.

DDmiTV

You would think the thing is under warranty after only 3 weeks, although I suppose that doesn't cover physical damage. I bought this phone because it was supposedly super-durable with gorilla glass and the like. Guess I blew that theory!

GalaxyClass

Sorry for your trouble :smileysad: , but I try to avoid any after market long term warranty insurance.

DDmiTV

Oh it's getting canceled today, believe me!

rcschnoor

So you purchased the insurance without asking what the deductible is? Regardless, the $150 deductible is MUCH lower than the $600 it would cost to replace the phone at full retail.

I'm curious, though, if ýou bought a new car and ran into a tree 3 weeks after the purchase, would you expect the dealer to give you a new car because it was still under warranty?

narntek

Warranty doesn't cover physical damage. I can point you in the direction of MISSION Repair, at www.missionrepair.com, they are awesome and do a good job! Affordable too! The TPP is basically for higher end phones like iPhone 6 plus, etc, because all you pay then is 130 to get the problem fixed.

DDmiTV

Actually, if I bought a new car and totaled it hitting a deer 3 weeks later, my insurance would replace the car at full retail value and waive the deductible (since I have Liberty Mutual and they offer that perk).

Granted, I should have read the fine print, and that was my mistake. Historically, the deductible for phone replacement has been $50. I was unaware that Asurion upped the deductible in October. Guess I need to do a better job of keeping up on those things.

But let's be honest. You and I know that Verizon gets these phones for a price far below retail. I did some pricing on EBay, and new or like-new Droid Maxx's are going for between $150-250 (and the higher prices are for 32GB unlocked phones). Since they buy the phones in bulk from Motorola, I'm willing to bet their per-unit price is below the $150 they're charging for replacement. Plus, according to Asurion's terms (and again, my fault for not reading the fine print), they have the discretion to replace the broken phone with a reconditioned phone, and even a different model from the unit originally purchased. GalaxyClass said it best - it's just not a good deal.

Now, I realize that Verizon is in business to make a profit, but I think there needs to be some flexibility here. Sometimes unforeseen stuff happens (after all, it's not like I threw the phone on the ground to test its durability - it was an accident). Yes, the rules are the rules, but that doesn't mean exceptions can't be made for extenuating circumstances. I've been a Verizon customer for 5 years and have never broken a phone, let alone a brand new phone. Don't you think it would be to Verizon's advantage to work with a customer on a reasonable solution, keep the customer happy, and in turn, make THOUSANDS of dollars in the long run by retaining that customer in the long run? To me, it's a matter of weighing the options and leaning toward the more profitable option. Then again, what do I know?

Snn5

I'm curious as to why the deductible was more than $100. Did the rates go up? Also, there are places that can repair the screen for much less than the deductible, usually in malls or shopping plazas. That's a pretty lucrative business nowadays and might be cheaper and easier for you.

rcschnoor

DDmiTV wrote:

Granted, I should have read the fine print, and that was my mistake. Historically, the deductible for phone replacement has been $50. I was unaware that Asurion upped the deductible in October. Guess I need to do a better job of keeping up on those things. Possibly the deductible for basic phones has "historically" been $50, but the deductible for smartphones thru Assurion has "historically" been $150. It did not raise from $50 to $150 in October as people have been complaining on these forums for more than a couple of years about the $150 smartphone deductible.

But let's be honest. You and I know that Verizon gets these phones for a price far below retail. Possibly you have better inside information than I do, but I don't know what Verizon pays for their phones. I think the margins on them are not as high as you would think, otherwise other outlets such as Amazon who like to undercut other retailers would be selling full retail phones for much lower.

I did some pricing on EBay, and new or like-new Droid Maxx's are going for between $150-250 (and the higher prices are for 32GB unlocked phones). Since they buy the phones in bulk from Motorola, I'm willing to bet their per-unit price is below the $150 they're charging for replacement. Plus, according to Asurion's terms (and again, my fault for not reading the fine print), they have the discretion to replace the broken phone with a reconditioned phone, and even a different model from the unit originally purchased. GalaxyClass said it best - it's just not a good deal. I have never said Assurion insurance was a good deal, quite the contrary, and that is why I do not get it. Regardless, if you purchase the insurance, you pay their deductible and live with their policies.

Now, I realize that Verizon is in business to make a profit, but I think there needs to be some flexibility here. Sometimes unforeseen stuff happens (after all, it's not like I threw the phone on the ground to test its durability - it was an accident). Yes, the rules are the rules, but that doesn't mean exceptions can't be made for extenuating circumstances. I've been a Verizon customer for 5 years and have never broken a phone, let alone a brand new phone. Don't you think it would be to Verizon's advantage to work with a customer on a reasonable solution, keep the customer happy, and in turn, make THOUSANDS of dollars in the long run by retaining that customer in the long run? No, then you would have people suddenly "breaking" their phone when they have decided they didn't necessarily like the phone they purchased. People have taken advantage of leniency such as this in the past and is the reason why Verizon is more strict in their upgrade/replacement/return policies than they used to be.

To me, it's a matter of weighing the options and leaning toward the more profitable option. Then again, what do I know?

Snn5

Was there a type of Grandfathered-in type of deductible with Asurion? I have never had a deductible less than or more than $99. Is that higher rate for new policy holders?

ynggrsshppr91

The rates haven't changed in years. Basic phones are still $50, Smartphones $100, and iPhones $170 to $200.

Salisbury

This is a common problem with cracked screens I have a Droid Maxx and cracked the screen. If I had a protective case in my situation it wouldn't have happened. Insurance is still worth while with a smartphone but not so great for cracked screens. I believe the new Samsung Galaxy s5 has gorilla glass?

To repair the Droid Maxx properly by a good place was $225. There were prices as high as $375. Some of the places I got estimates from offered me $150 for the Droid Maxx as is, which I refused.

If anyone tells you they can replace just the glass, they don't know what they are talking about. You have to replace the top section and it has the glass embedded into the plastic, so it's the whole top cover piece.

Good luck, might as well get it repaired with what insurance will cover after deductible. It is a good smartphone.

Child Item