Hi. I have been researching how to increase the WiFi on the second floor of my house (about 2k sqft). The FIOS Quantum Gateway modem / router is located in the office in the basement (yep, not the best location). I am able to hard-wire my work laptops, but the kids room get very little WiFi. With their schools stating they may go virtual this fall, i would like to increase the WiFi coverage in their rooms.
I have researched getting a FIOS Network Extender (https://www.verizon.com/home/accessories/fios-network-extender/) as we do have a coax connection in the master bedroom. Of course, then we have a big extender with a wire from the wall sitting on the floor.
I have also researched mesh options such as the Eero. In their FAQ at https://support.eero.com/hc/en-us/articles/207987916, they describe the double Nat and bridging of the devices. I like the idea of a mesh network as I can add additional beacons (or equivalent) should an area of the house be spotty.
We do have FIOS One TV, but it is hard-wired via a coax cable. I am hoping that since it is wired the functionality would be unaffected by bridging the devices. The spouse (and kids) acceptance factor to any solution will be negatively affected should the TV functionality not be there.
At bit more about my set up. the ONT is in the garage. Wires (coax / cat) run from the ONT to the modem / router which are about 10 feet from each other. As mentioned the modem / router is in the basement. I have the gigabit connection. I cannot readily wire their rooms and believe it would be expensive to pay someone.
Before I spend money on any solution, I am hoping you might shed some light on questions I have.
Would the FIOS extender or a mesh network be better in the long run?
Will doing the double NAT and bridging not affect the TV functionality?
What other options to I have to increase WiFi coverage in the kids rooms on the second floor?
Thanks in advance.